Created all? sag mill recipes #81
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Area-Assets
Area-Backend
Area-Conduits
Area-Datapacks
Area-Lang
Area-Mod Compat
Area-Parity
Area-Rendering
Good first issue
MC-1.19.2
MC-1.20.1
MC-1.20.4
MC-1.20.6
MC-1.21
MC-1.21.1
Modtoberfest
P-0-High
P-1-Medium
P-2-Low
Status-Awaiting Response
Status-Behind-Flag
Status-Blocked
Status-Cannot Reproduce
Status-Duplicate
Status-Help Wanted
Status-Incomplete Report
Status-Invalid
Status-Needs LTS Backport
Status-Needs Updating
Status-Stale
Status-To Implement
Status-Triage
Status-Wontfix
Status-Wontmerge
Type-Backport
Type-Bug
Type-Documentation
Type-Enhancement
Type-Question
Type-RFC
Type-Suggestion
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Team-EnderIO/EnderIO#81
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "dev/1.19.x"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Registered what I think is all the Sag mill recipes added by enderIO in 1.12
Note that exporting tags as outputs seem broken, so the outputs generally points to items.
There also seem to be a bug where the first output item of an inputted stack disappears for some reason. Was that way when I cloned and is like that still since I didn't find the cause
This should not be a breaking change.
(Also) note that this is my first PR for this project so if all isn't as it should be then I'll correct it if I get pointed in the right direction
Could you expand on what is broken please?
Interesting, if you could file a bug report with a few reproduction steps that'd be fantastic.
Thanks for the PR, I'll check this over now and then I'll ask to to execute the
runDatatarget to generate the JSON files :)yields error in runData task while:
Is fine, I talked to EpicSquid who says it's a vanilla feature.
Sure, I'll do that!
For some reason I thought that they should be left behind just like compile units are in C++ projects, but I'll supply those ;)
Regarding the bug it seems like it's been fixed when I test it now, so never mind. I committed the generated files in a second commit. However I haven't figured out how to merge them together to one to make it neater...
I just tried the sand recipe builder with the silicon tag and it was working fine, what error was it giving you?
Some review comments for you. I'd have to pop open a 1.12.2 environment to check these and I dont have the time right now
Please add
.vscode/to the gitignore file.@ -14,33 +15,303 @@ import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation;import net.minecraft.tags.ItemTags;Change this for the silicon tag, it compiled and generated fine for me.
I'm not sure there is a sugarcane tag?
Erroneous how?
@ -42,0 +152,4 @@output(STRING, 0.1f)),BASE_ENERGY_PER_OPERATION, finishedRecipeConsumer);build("quartz_block", Ingredient.of(Tags.Items.STORAGE_BLOCKS_QUARTZ), List.of(What do you mean any:glowstone, you mean a tag for any glowstone block?
@ -42,0 +152,4 @@output(STRING, 0.1f)),BASE_ENERGY_PER_OPERATION, finishedRecipeConsumer);build("quartz_block", Ingredient.of(Tags.Items.STORAGE_BLOCKS_QUARTZ), List.of(Yes, It'd be for like the chisel variants of glowstone blocks
@ -14,33 +15,303 @@ import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation;import net.minecraft.tags.ItemTags;Well then, I'll remove the todo then
@ -14,33 +15,303 @@ import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation;import net.minecraft.tags.ItemTags;Sorry, left some test code, removing!
@ -14,33 +15,303 @@ import net.minecraft.resources.ResourceLocation;import net.minecraft.tags.ItemTags;Weird, could have sworn that it crashed for me just a couple of days ago, but now it seems fine like you say... I donno... swapped to the tag like you said
Done
@ -42,0 +152,4 @@output(STRING, 0.1f)),BASE_ENERGY_PER_OPERATION, finishedRecipeConsumer);build("quartz_block", Ingredient.of(Tags.Items.STORAGE_BLOCKS_QUARTZ), List.of(that is chisel:glowstone, but I'm not sure if we should have such a tag. Maybe we should create a tag like forge:glowstone and put chisel:glowstone into it
@ -42,0 +152,4 @@output(STRING, 0.1f)),BASE_ENERGY_PER_OPERATION, finishedRecipeConsumer);build("quartz_block", Ingredient.of(Tags.Items.STORAGE_BLOCKS_QUARTZ), List.of(But I didn't find any tag, so leaving it as it is for now...
@ -42,0 +152,4 @@output(STRING, 0.1f)),BASE_ENERGY_PER_OPERATION, finishedRecipeConsumer);build("quartz_block", Ingredient.of(Tags.Items.STORAGE_BLOCKS_QUARTZ), List.of(Creating tags are far above my knowledge, so I'm afraid that has to be left out of this PR
Energy cost is a bit off, but otherwise fine. Some recipes have changed compared to 1.12, but I don't think it's a problem. Also we might need to change energy cost, but that can be done later
If no one has anything against merging this (except the merge conflict, but I can fix that myself) I'm going to do that tomorrow
Happy for you to fix and merge 👍