multismelting #271

Merged
justliliandev merged 2 commits from fix/multismelting into dev/1.20.1 2023-07-11 07:25:49 +00:00
justliliandev commented 2023-07-09 18:05:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Description

Allloy Smelter now pulls from multiple slots and starts from the last one

Fixes issue(s): #251

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (.editorconfig, most IDEs will use this for you)
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
# Description Allloy Smelter now pulls from multiple slots and starts from the last one Fixes issue(s): #251 # Checklist: - [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project (.editorconfig, most IDEs will use this for you) - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) approved these changes 2023-07-09 19:15:21 +00:00
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Looks good, just a small question :)

Looks good, just a small question :)
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-07-09 19:14:18 +00:00

What was the reason for renaming this class?

What was the reason for renaming this class?
justliliandev (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-07-09 19:17:47 +00:00
justliliandev (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-07-09 19:17:47 +00:00

Duplicate Name. This would clash with the implements Container for the Sub Wrapper. Wait mvmd, I've moved that one, no it's not needed but to distinguish between the Container interface and the subwrapper

Duplicate Name. This would clash with the implements Container for the Sub Wrapper. Wait mvmd, I've moved that one, no it's not needed but to distinguish between the Container interface and the subwrapper
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-07-09 19:19:16 +00:00
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-07-09 19:19:16 +00:00

Hmm, unsure if thats a good idea or not because we've called it "Container" for all of the other recipes. Maybe we could rename all the recipe containers "RecipeContainer" instead? Might be a good way to differ it from the interface

Hmm, unsure if thats a good idea or not because we've called it "Container" for all of the other recipes. Maybe we could rename all the recipe containers "RecipeContainer" instead? Might be a good way to differ it from the interface
justliliandev (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-07-10 21:59:33 +00:00
justliliandev (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-07-10 21:59:33 +00:00

I don't think it's necessary, it's just needed for the distinction between this specific wrapper and the subwrapper, I wouldn't change them all, as this only adds to the readability in this case

I don't think it's necessary, it's just needed for the distinction between this specific wrapper and the subwrapper, I wouldn't change them all, as this only adds to the readability in this case
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2023-07-11 07:25:27 +00:00
Rover656 (Migrated from github.com) commented 2023-07-11 07:25:27 +00:00

Makes sense, thanks a lot!

Makes sense, thanks a lot!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: Team-EnderIO/EnderIO#271
No description provided.